My 2c on Airdrop-Selling drama:

+ I worked with Merkle on an Airdrop. They didn't impose their criteria on us, they helped us to set *our* critieria.

+ Therefore, I think many people are mistakingly taking Dan's comment as a threat "from Dan" when, in fact, it is his observation of what Airdrop Teams will decide for their self-interest.

+ And I'd say Dan's point is directionally correct – giving airdrops that seem likely to be insta-sold is less appealing to Teams than the opposite.

+ However, selling does *not* have to overwhelm all other criteria. Eg, if someone is a power-user of many apps and tokens like @tricil.eth, this may be more important to a Team than whether he sold a drop or not.

tldr: Dan's point clearly has merit, but Airdrop Criteria is a unique decision made by each Team (not by Merkle!)

Well said 

If your argument is “selling is good for your app actually” you need to convince the developers considering airdrops, not me.

Dear @dwr.eth 

The fact is that not all Airdroppers always sell immediately, some believe in the project and choose to hold it (this depends on their finances).

But Farmers always sell Airdrops immediately, even if their finances are good.
Farmers are still farmers.

Not everyone in this world is rich and can be an investor, most of them are looking to feed their families.

Without them, how can we find good entry?

This is all part of life, enjoy it

You can't make everyone happy, but you have helped them to eat.