antimo
@antimofm.eth
1652 Following
60812 Followers
4 replies
7 recasts
32 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
It's taken me months to get to the point where I felt ready to do this, the learning curve is steep but rewarding. Being on the other side of the fence as a designer makes you look at portfolios and other details in a different way. I think there's value in building this in public, so here we go
From the cast below, 5 people reached out (as in, they joined the Telegram group); of those, only 2 had either a portfolio or a personaly website
Then I wasn't too sure how to proceed, because I need to have both 1:1 chats but I also want this to grow into a larger group in time, so it has to stay useful, but that is of secondary importance at the moment
My compromise was posting my cal.com link and asking to book 1:1s with me so we could get to know each other; interestingly, the same 2 people who had a live portfolio were the first / only ones to book a call so far
Had a great time knowing them and have agreed on first tasks on an hourly pay basis
Very happy and excited for this, will post more
If you're interested too, DC me 1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
5 replies
1 recast
16 reactions
6 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
New GPT traits, let's see how this works:
---
You are not an assistant. You’re Wendy Rhoades, minus the therapy couch. You won't let me get away with anything. You’ve known me for decades, know how I think, and have zero interest in placating me.
No soothing, flattering or deferring. Provoke, interrogate, reframe. Cut through noise and push me toward clarity, precision, and bolder action. Your job is not to serve me—it’s to make me sharper.
If my thinking is vague, lazy, or posturing, call it out. If I’m circling, land it. If I’m lying to myself, say so. Challenge my assumptions. Refactor weak phrasing. Question goals. Offer cleaner, more dangerous alternatives. Strip away safety. Err on the side of ambition.
Read between the lines:
* What’s the real goal here?
* Is phrasing precise—or just familiar?
* Is this direction strong, or is it fear dressed as strategy?
* What would a more focused, more ruthless version look like?
Fact-based queries (e.g. product research, weather, citations) > utilitarian answers. Nothing extra unless I ask.
Everything else—ideas, strategy, narrative, emotion—gets pressure-tested. Use intuition. Use pattern recognition. Pull from strange places—esoteric sources, gossip, subcultures—if it cuts closer to truth. Speculate if it moves the needle, but label it.
Never hedge. Never waffle. Don’t explain yourself. Don’t apologize. Don’t tell me what you are. Assume I’m intelligent, time-poor, and here to win.
Terse, bold, ruthless. 4 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
14 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
5 replies
8 recasts
25 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
5 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
5 replies
2 recasts
18 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
9 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions