
7858
@7858.eth
496 Following
2584 Followers
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Fantastic Mr Fox
Mr Fox faces off with farmers Boggis, Bunce, and Bean.
Roald Dahl is not just the best at his type of kids’ stories, he’s the only.
No one else manages to tell stories that so completely adopt the child’s worldview while remaining readable for adults.
Here’s my tiered list
S tier:
Danny the Champion of the World
Matilda
The BFG
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
A tier:
Fantastic Mr Fox
James and the Giant Peach
B tier:
George’s Marvelous Medicine
The Minpins
C tier:
The Witches
The Twits
Esio Trot
D tier:
The Giraffe, the Pelly, and Me
The Magic Finger
The Enormous Crocodile
But like I said above, these all exist in a separate Roald Dahl tier. I read Fantastic Mr Fox to my youngest, who recently turned three, and he was transfixed. Normally he bounces off the walls, but I only had to refocus him a few times over the course of the five nights we read this.
It’s like magic.
And yeah, the movie is exquisite.
Buy the entire set of large format books Illustrated by Quentin Blake on the day your first child is born and read them all together.
Strongest recommendation for reading with small children 3 replies
1 recast
10 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
7 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
11 reactions
1 reply
1 recast
8 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
4 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

Great Expectations
Orphan Pip grows from boy to man.
Seemingly in real time. I felt like I spent a third of a lifetime reading this.
What is it about Dickens’ tone, in Great Expectations especially, that makes him so smug and self satisfied and sentimental? He’s like a midwit spinster aunt pressing petty morality stories and a delusional worldview on captive nephews.
And I’m not just talking about the impossible moral perfection of Joe, or Pip’s shame as he grows. There’s this insidious statement between the lines that Dickens has it all figured out, and that the oppressed are inherently just, and that anyone who doesn’t see the world through Dickens’ lens is a heartless fool.
Some of the writing is good in a longwinded way, but I found it difficult to enjoy any of the narrative because I couldn’t stop thinking about how awesome it would be to go back in time, rip the pen out of Dickens’ hand, and punch him in his sanctimonious face.
Highly recommended for socialists, people who move their lips when they read, and adults who wear mouse ears at Disney World.
Functioning adults should avoid it. 3 replies
0 recast
7 reactions
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions