if you're new to tokenomics, here's a great 101 for you https://every.to/almanack/tokenomics-101

1 reply

0 recast

3 reactions

none of the coins say "join the movement" there must be a circulation sink that's self-explanatory "I'm part of the movement" even better if there's self-explanatory "I'm this deep in the movement, and I'm moving 'there'"

0 reply

1 recast

2 reactions

unisocks or it didn't happen

0 reply

1 recast

2 reactions

$CLANKER should be waterfalled to a miniapp leaderboard of D30

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

tmf = token market fit

4 replies

1 recast

13 reactions

one consideration of infra is keeping the dGENs private as cold-hard wallets, or as everyday carry of bearer keys/permissions/programs, or as onchain objects like EIP-4337. this doesn't necessarily exclude the possibility of dispersing to dGENs as a private set, and gathering anonymous votes via franchise proof. imho, a lot of potential in evolving this association set in the same way that the peripheral hardware & network can evolve, which begs the question what goods the tokens redeem into, whether they've shipped, but doesn't demand the totality of who and where the recipients are of either goods or tokens. https://docs.privacypools.com/layers/asp https://developer.vocdoni.io/protocol/anonymity/zk-census-proof

1 reply

0 recast

15 reactions

no-loss lotteries should only pay out streams, which should also help with growing the anonymity set.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

imho, we should be seeing a lot more market-based curation a platform like @zora can and should organize feeds by Harberger taxation. what's more "trending" than a race to displace $ZORA-recycling "power badge", and how would up-and-coming creators experience retention if their mutual feed wasn't exclusive to anyone competing to be one of 10,000 common burners of their creator coin? market honesty is a latent force to be harnessed, and any centralized preemption is going to pale in comparison. https://x.com/0x_m_j_r/status/1942958650315636940

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

imagine @clanker that batch TWAPs back to ETH

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

https://x.com/pridesai/status/1895944068368384210 crypto is generally downstream of fiat in shades of legitimacy, because it's the incentive of last resort (in monetary collapse). it's not inferior, but it can only be as legitimate as the incentives codified in front of it, or the liquidity. I think a devil's advocate point needs to be made for low-float, annually-issued memecoins. this doesn't need a limiting principle, but rather a forcing principle, and imho there hasn't been any successful attempts at standardizing "the dev"/core. at some point, the basic facets of CTO should be enshrined for a vibe closer to Proof of Work. part of Bitcoin's appeal is how much was burned over time through misadventure, unendingly. I wonder if it would be appealing to demonstrate how much is initially locked to goals into the future, with tranche-shunting as well as slashing.

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Is anyone down to talk about token reward design? Context #3 https://warpcast.com/vinayvasanji.eth/0x65810fde

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Is there something akin to a SAFE or SAFT but instead of equity or tokens, you just commit to a share of future cash flow?

2 replies

0 recast

3 reactions

https://research.allo.capital/t/allo-dao-design-competition/55 @askgina.eth what are the important considerations?

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

instead of level autoprogression... use FID-bound onchain XP, separate from token contract, then offer opt-in burn of the memecoin to trigger the level-up beyond that, can stat gains be as FID-bound? can each stat represent a DeFi niche (e.g. luck with locked przTokens)? this is easy to communicate as credibly neutral, it scales to all wallets, it unlocks lore in exchange for locking a lower-value liquidity. launchpads denominated in that memecoin can even use that as sybil-resistant "raindrop" XP can be reasonably gifted by higher-levels, not just admins. https://warpcast.com/m-j-r.eth/0x47d3b093

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

the tokenomics casts will continue until incentives improve speaking of "farmers", the water is extremely muddied. everyone is talking past each other to sell the legitimacy of "their take", and it strikes my as the tyranny of structurelessness (https://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm) everyone should ask themselves, what are the distributive tranches? there's the team. we're still digesting $VVV without vesting. there are replyguys. is this where Tip4Tip meta exists? there's bounty claimers. look at all the organic content that makes its way through /poidh there are LPs. the trick seems to be unit bias with a hidden dilution. there are charitable organizations. there's a ridiculous amount of friction here, a ridiculous amount of sell pressure, but a legit value prop for just holding the token as a virtue. there are smart contract with fee splits. deeply undervalued. that can't be all of it. where are the serial organizers/operators? all of this needs further *consistent* codification.

0 reply

0 recast

2 reactions