@m-j-r
O/H in orgo: "Nature is perverse"
to further articulate that, consider that genetic flourishing of sexual reproduction manifested in defense against coevolving parasites.
if one judges human agency in the broader frame of nature, we are quirks within quirks within...and we collectively aren't that useful within that null hypothesis
ecologically, there are many notable species that cannot exist without preexisting symbioses (e.g. coral, mycorrhizae, leafcutter ants, figs, etc)
local anthropocentric optima can be destroyed by higher-level legibility, but likewise, local villages can adopt infanticidal concepts like "changelings" or "snake children" for "strange differences". only in modern circumstances are these behaviors spared, and this is actually reinforcing of the quirky human condition, despite the speculated detriment.
now that our techne includes composable cryptography and autonomy, the challenge of tolerating the despicable and controversial is even more worthwhile, even if it may only become legible in the far future. this is one of the defining arguments for space colonization, that it's where the remaining science is, where the ulterior purpose begins, and our intuitive discomfort and disposal should inherently be weighed as erroneous as nature is in covering the world in bottom-feeding crabs and sunlight-hoarding plants.
https://farcaster.xyz/cameron/0xe3b54c7d
https://farcaster.xyz/m-j-r/0x9e94f1a5