@m-j-r.eth
to comprehend why there's school of accomplishment in anthropic negation, one can "read the canon" of dialectical materialism, which is rhetoric from the barrel of a gun pointed at the political animal. it suggests a Manichean struggle, good and evil, belief which is fashioned by a sheltered perspective. for example, Marx lived off Engels, whose family business was spinning cotton from American slaves, but the distance is enough for indifference.
there's explicable sociopathy in joining a collective story for aesthetic and acceptance, and remaining despite actions like Lenin rejecting neo-Kantianism. after all, the skeptic may entertain positivism, affine to empiricism struggling against nature, more capable of inflicting attrition. while academics can be destroyed by violence instead of debate, the cleric achieves posterity in the diaspora of speechcrime.
as with Sartre and Fanon, all humans are foundationally guilty, so cathartic predation solves all trauma. state-building is responsible, so it is evil.