infosec
Discussions about information security and privacy
@m-j-r.eth
Marcus Hutchins makes a good point, but there's always an opportunity to apply a reward like hypercertificates to leaderboards like https://code4rena.com/leaderboard
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
@m-j-r.eth
good thread for those without obese dictator blindness
https://x.com/zachxbt/status/2041873508180095032?s=20
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
@joeblau
https://research.google/blog/safeguarding-cryptocurrency-by-disclosing-quantum-vulnerabilities-responsibly/
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
@royalaid
So this is a legit problem for every internet facing system. Basically everyone has access to their person TAO.
https://sockpuppet.org/blog/2026/03/30/vulnerability-research-is-cooked/
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
@royalaid
So it looks like it might be a bit of challenge with a flurry of zerodays coming soon.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
@m-j-r.eth
"a sustained pattern of negligence" is easier to address than the nth-order consequences of these breaches.
https://dailydarkweb.net/lexisnexis-investigates-massive-data-breach-by-fulcrumsec/
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
@mantej
Signal provides Perfect Forward Secrecy which prevents a key compromise from exposing previously exchanged messages.
X Chat does not provide PFS and collects a lot more metadata.
0 reply
0 recast
11 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
@m-j-r.eth
the original design was sandwiched stamped wafer, but there's just too much custodial trust.
a similar risk with quantum-resistance is that these contracts & the multisig oracle are not PQC (yet).
wonder if @quilibrium supports Wesolowski VDF
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction