codeslaw
for code of laws, "code is law", and other lexical activities
I think we underappreciate and cherry-pick constitutionality, what codification means in concert with historical context.
the United States Bill of Rights was ratified as a bundle of amendments and many of those amendments are expressed complementary to others, like stanzas of a poem.
for example, the 2nd amendment would not make sense without the 3rd and 4th elaborating on securing persons, homes, papers, and effects, and this was in response to the tyranny of the Insufferable Acts.
the 5th amendment would be too exploitable without 6th, 7th, and 8th corollaries. by themselves, any one would be reasonable but too weak to regulatory overreach that the others prohibit.
the 1rst amendment would not be able to prohibit the establishment of ideological law or reinforce peaceful assembly and petition in opposition, if the 10th did not reinforce displacement of those ideological contests to peerdom of the states or their constituencies.
eventually, cryptoeconomics must crystallize in a similar fashion, or it will become too brittle to be eternal. perhaps even these rights will be neglected to the point of dissolution, just like node incentives and network security can fade against the backdrop of the free market.
the point is to find equilibrium without denial or disparagement, and this bundle is profoundly robust. 0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
6 recasts
8 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
1 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction