- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
Creators kept asking for opportunities @base.base.eth finally dropped one. Time to prove you’re more than “soon” tweets. Keep Baseposting 🟦
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
Don’t sleep on $CLANKER. With only 1,000,000 tokens total supply and ~986K circulating, every protocol fee that turns into buybacks + burns = instant scarcity squeeze. Today’s reality check: the protocol already used 2/3 of yesterday’s fees to buy back ≈ $65k worth of $CLANKER — and they announced plans to automate regular repurchases. That’s not PR that’s capital returning to token holders. Market speaks: current market cap sits in the $120–140M band while daily volume and social integrations are spiking — a tiny float + recurring buybacks = volatility that favors fast appreciation. Big structural edge: deeper Farcaster integration + on-chain social utility puts CLANKER in prime position to capture fee flow from new activity inside a live social stack - more utility → more fees → more buybacks. Play the math (straight): if protocol fees ever hit $10,000,000/day and the team keeps the 2/3 → buyback rule, that’s 10,000,000 × 2/3 = 6,666,666.67 USD deployed to buybacks every single day. With a 1M supply, that’s seismic. (Hypothetical, but illuminating.) Reality check: that 10M/day is a stretch — but the mechanism is real and already live. Small dips? Sure. Major retraces? Unlikely when tokenomics keep forcing buys and burns into the market. Act like you believe in scarcity mechanics — markets follow flows. TL;DR If you want a bet where supply mechanics + protocol fee buybacks actually force tightening, $CLANKER is one of the rare setups where the math favors holders. Buybacks are happening. Automation is coming. Scarcity is the play.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions