Yorick
@yorick
52 Following
32 Followers
Casts
Casts + replies
Yorick
@yorick
@justindrake “Five CL teams” - cold 🤣. Grandine is #6; Lambda Elixir maybe eventually #7
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yorick
@yorick
@vitalik.eth Worst case scenario for Prysm and Lighthouse is a little heavier - they could “strand” their validators in a very specific scenario. Potuz explains this here, it happened on Goerli with Prysm: https://twitter.com/potuz_eth/status/1768418899111113125?t=iFkj6z-YnD1n3GzlyGertA&s=19 Ideally we have no CL > 1/3rd and no EL > 2/3rd.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yorick
@yorick
Really heartening to see a team that tackles tech debt instead of carrying legacy code forever because new features >>> code maintenance https://github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/pull/29169
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yorick
@yorick
PSA if you were in the CLWP cohort: Exit your validator and make a fresh one on a fresh, secure mnemonic. The attacker with your compromised mnemonic can slash you, and if they are savvy, get paid for it by the protocol.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yorick
@yorick
CLWP reports 100% success rate. All 2133 validators were changed to the address of their rightful owners. If even just 10% of these were actually compromised, that’s a lot of ETH that was rescued. Outstanding job!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Yorick
@yorick
Shapella went well. Execution changes and withdrawals are being processed, and of course exits work as before. CLWP did good work to help protect people whose mnemonic was compromised. They seem to have been largely successful. Two hot fixes out that users may want: Lighthouse and Prysm.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
