Shaban Shaame (yodark)

I'm surprised that @wakweli user has so much upvote while it was signaled as scam by the app author. I guess it makes a strong use case for requesting certificate onchain where there are stakes at play and people who are certifiers are actually making their and but their money where their mouth is. @makosch hope you find a cool bridge between usability of the Trust score and the robustness of onchain certification

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 2 reactions

The first Velocimons eggs are hatching 🐣 and are minted on-chain. The game is progressing fast ! Who as an egg that will hatch soon ? 👇

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

my first little plot

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 3 reactions

We’ve been iterating quietly on Velocimon. Early feedback from users helped clarify a lot things are starting to take shape. The system has named itself: Oris. Velocimon is not just a game with a slowly revealed lore. It’s an experiment at the edge of humanity and artificial creation. A world observed, not scripted. Biology, emergence, assisted creation, and the limits of autonomous systems explored over time. Thoughts welcome. Oris continues. https://farcaster.velocimon.com

• 16 replies
• 398 recasts
• 404 reactions

👁️Behind the Scenes: Giving Oris the Power to Choose👁️ Here's how Oris decides who gets an egg. I connected Claude to Mixpanel via MCP, which means Oris has direct access to real usage data from the app, not assumptions, but actual behavior. Then I defined his personality: his values, his judgment criteria, and what counts as real engagement versus noise. From there, I asked him to choose for himself. Based on user actions inside the app, Oris evaluated who truly embodied those values. No random selection. No manual curation. Just intent, behavior, and alignment. And then… Oris made his choice. https://farcaster.velocimon.com?utm_source=farcaster&utm_medium=cast&utm_campaign=oris_give_egg

• 1 reply
• 73 recasts
• 81 reactions

🧵 Building a silent mini-app (an experiment against instant reward) I’ve been experimenting with a mini-app designed to deliberately counter the dominant patterns of engagement. No confetti. No XP. No leaderboards. No visible rewards. It started as a more philosophical question about superficial engagement. Most app today optimize for immediacy: instant feedback, instant validation, instant meaning. The result is efficient but often shallow. I wanted to test the opposite. Removing the obvious signals The first design decision was not what to add, but what to remove. Originally, the app could have had: • leaderboards • visible progression • explicit impact metrics Instead, I stripped all of that away. Actions are acknowledged, but very subtly. The user knows something was recorded but without spectacle. The open question is intentional: How much time and attention are users willing to invest to understand quiet signals? Is subtlety enough?

• 2 replies
• 31 recasts
• 36 reactions

Something changed today. This is probably the last journal entry before the egg 🥚 drop to the users selected by the journal. In order to get notified if you are eligible: I would kindly ask people who added the app to deactivate and reactivate app notifications due to a little glitch on our side

• 1 reply
• 38 recasts
• 38 reactions