@yaleobadiah

Different blockchains respond differently to sudden capital inflows. Comparing Ethereum, Base, and Solana, one can examine fee spikes and active addresses during inflow windows. Ethereum often exhibits fee congestion, while Solana’s parallelization allows smoother absorption. Base, being newer, may see higher volatility in activity-to-fee ratios. Cross-chain comparison of fee elasticity and TPS resilience indicates which network can withstand traffic surges without destabilizing user costs. This is critical for traders deciding where liquidity will concentrate. High resilience chains may attract sustainable flows, while fragile fee environments can discourage participation despite capital inflow.