xenoliss (xenoliss)

xenoliss

Working for a more decentralized world

61 Followers

Recent casts

Is there a benefit to use MMR over a basic Merkle Tree with a dynamic height (growing on demand as nodes are appended to it)?

  • 0 replies
  • 0 recasts
  • 0 reactions

I'm looking for a vector commitment scheme that, for a proof P_i generated against a com C, preserve the proofs validity against a new com C' if the ith element is still the same. Does that exist?

  • 0 replies
  • 0 recasts
  • 0 reactions

Hey @vitalik.eth I've been working on the concept of a Minimal Keystore Rollup you proposed about a year ago. After experimenting with several approaches, we noticed a common flaw in all of them. When someone changes their keys, it causes the Merkle root of the rollup to change as well. This leads to a unique consequence that we don't see in other chains or rollups: wallet signatures expire. This happens because a wallet signature needs to include some form of inclusion/exclusion proof against the current root of the rollup. Once the root changes, the proof becomes invalid, and so does the signature. I'm curious if you had any thoughts on this?

  • 0 replies
  • 0 recasts
  • 1 reaction

Top casts

Was reading ERC-1271, and I can't figure out this: "the specific return value is expected to be returned instead of a boolean in order to have stricter and simpler verification of a signature" How is returning 0x1626ba7e/0xffffffff stricter or simpler than returning true/false ?

  • 1 reply
  • 0 recasts
  • 0 reactions

Mh, maybe, but then it could have been said a bit more explicitly. Upon collision, it would simply mean the contract is compliant without knowing it. Not sure to see how that could be bad 🤔

  • 0 replies
  • 0 recasts
  • 0 reactions

recast:farcaster://casts/0x6a4ffac894017b0612186cbb42d0002f68dd902c52cda34c6df55bd44abd01f4

  • 0 replies
  • 0 recasts
  • 0 reactions

Onchain profile

Ethereum addresses