@wilsoncusack on Farcaster: "gm Farcaster Pro Max Ultra use..."

6mo

gm Farcaster Pro Max Ultra users We've been doing a lot of work on how to make the Sub Account + Spend Permission pitch to users clearly and succinctly when they're connecting to apps. What do you think of this?

12recasts·

1quote·

52likes·

3.6Kviews

6mo

I would just say “allow this app to spend up to $10 or .0001 ETGa day”

wilsoncusack

6mo

This is what we say for pure spend limit request. For sub account I think this is missing the “why would I want this/what does this get me?”

henri

6mo

I’d even skip the transaction confirmation bit: “what’s a transaction confirmation?” Just “allow x to use up to $10 of my balance daily (you can always revoke this later”

wilsoncusack

6mo

Thank you! But if you’re a user connecting to an app, why would you want to do that? Does the user need some “this is going to give you a faster and smoother UX” motivation?

henri

6mo

My take is it’s broadly going to be contextual, ie up to the app to clarify that context. The wallet trying to do that will be too clunky.

gregarious

6mo

Personally, I think the word Skip throws me off. "Auto-Approve" feels closer to the truth. "Auto-Approve Micro Transactions" "Auto-Approve Transactions under $0.01" or invert it? "I want to approve all transactions" Not sure that helps.