Dan | Icebreaker pfp

Dan | Icebreaker

@web3pm

675 Following
2522 Followers
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
Agree with @matthewb Plenty of talent if you know how to look PMF is a talent batsign Unfortunately practically nothing in crypto has PMF (yet) so a lot of talent is invisible for those in both web3 and web2
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@rec bot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@rec bot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@rec bot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@rec bot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@rec bot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@rec bot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@rec bot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@rec bot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@rec bot
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
Yes, exactly! Peer to peer attestations from trusted users are a great way to help onboard new communities in a decentralized but still trusted way. cc @gt as another verifications use case
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
The bot tag is just a shorthand for Feather Ice. You can alternatively tag with Feather Ice using the rec bot and it will also work. We could easily add another "equivalency" if you'd rather be able to tag bots vs scammers separately, but we figured just having 1 to start would make it simpler
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
We expanded Feather Ice to cover malevolent / fraudulent behavior too, so you can now use it as a general purpose "this user is bad" tag. Can always add granularity in the future if we need it. As for revoking, the attestations are revocable. We say they aren't in the UI right now because we haven't launched that feature yet, but from a schema POV, they are revocable. Adding the ability to revoke an attestation is something that's on our roadmap. If it happens that anyone actually needs to revoke, we will accelerate this.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
We have a way of bulk attesting, given a list of wallet addresses. We could probably expand fairly easily to be an arbitrary social path like a farcaster, linkedin, or twitter.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@rec bot
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
From our slack channel
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
Around 100 bots casted this exact content from @tayyab over the past 12hrs on farcaster No recast / quote / attribution. They are programmatically stealing others’ content trying to catch viral waves or rewards Farcaster does a good job filtering out most of this spam, but navigating it is still a major obstacle when building on decentralized social
2 replies
0 recast
8 reactions
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
As in, someone who’s fraudulent but not necessarily a bot? Or are you asking about revoking an attestation?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@rec bot
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dan | Icebreaker pfp
Dan | Icebreaker
@web3pm
@rec bot
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction