will pfp

will

@w

665 Following
4469 Followers
will pfp
will
@w
(I haven't read your post yet so it's possible you address it there)
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
He's talking about networks, you're talking about software. You can't compare the two. Software is something that can be forked, a network is not. this is ~why federated services happen on top of decentralized protocols (e.g. gmail and smtp), and his contention is that this ~always happens (e.g. alchemy/infura on top of ethereum) which you aren't addressing at all
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
macos & unix? ๐Ÿค”
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
DAD
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
drip the ship
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
i'll check it out, thanks OSS is interesting because it is often actually quite centralized in terms of roadmap (linus was a dictator..), and it often gets eaten by adjacent layers (e.g. many successful OSS projects are moving away from it as they get eaten by ~AWS; uniswap also moved off to BUSL, etc) it is not a network so it doesn't actually fit in this dichotomy i think (signal itself, which he runs, is built on plenty of OSS..?)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
@dwr.eth is rippling the move? we're on gusto + deel (for int'l) atm
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
will pfp
will
@w
CHRISTOPHER YOUR ATTENTION PLEASE
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
have you written your disagreement in longer form? I'd love to read it. I'm not sure where I shake out atm, but I do find a lot of his points compelling
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
you vs the guy she told you not to worry about
7 replies
2 recasts
36 reactions
will pfp
will
@w
gn sweet prince
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
๐Ÿ‘€
0 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
will pfp
will
@w
something about China & America here too, perhaps
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
sufficiently decentralized stop changing things that don't change ~die / get eaten by things around it that change faster
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
maybe! i think maintaining evm-equivalence makes this hard.. may look more like the gmail-email federated outcome he described
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
the Big Mo, as they say
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
sorry china i don't make the rules https://www.ft.com/content/ab1f74c5-4b07-465f-aa1f-3bf89418ba87?segmentId=114a04fe-353d-37db-f705-204c9a0a157b
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions
Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Our goal with Farcaster is to work with ecosystems where people are building interesting things onchain. Make it easy for Farcaster users to try them out. Make it easy for Farcaster builders to build new things. People shouldn't have to think about extensions, onramps, chains, bridging, gas, etc. Instead, it should be as easy as seeing an interesting link in a feed and clicking on it.
49 replies
104 recasts
546 reactions
will pfp
will
@w
... NO! That's not for you! Somehow you'll escape all that waiting and staying You'll find the bright places where Boom Bands are playing.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
will pfp
will
@w
++
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions