Vitalik Buterin pfp
Vitalik Buterin
@vitalik.eth
Against choosing your political allegiances based on who is "pro-crypto" https://vitalik.eth.limo/general/2024/07/17/procrypto.html
132 replies
247 recasts
1180 reactions
Lite Crypto pfp
Lite Crypto
@ligerwoods
"internationalism" very nice way of phrasing "globalism".
3 replies
0 recast
21 reactions
Thumbs Up pfp
Thumbs Up
@thumbsup.eth
Excellent post! I noticed a very small typo if youโ€™d like to fix it for clarity: I imagine you meant โ€œmostโ€
1 reply
0 recast
15 reactions
Linda Xie pfp
Linda Xie
@linda
Appreciate you writing this https://x.com/ljxie/status/1667236973260447751
3 replies
12 recasts
175 reactions
prometheusbrown ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
prometheusbrown ๐ŸŽฉ
@brownalytics
On point. Just a note on Cypherpunk. True that it had โ€œbroader techno-libertarian ethosโ€ but this description minimizes the contribution of the then-radical left, which Iโ€™d argue is a pattern that can be connected to why the current broad left donโ€™t see themselves aligned with this movement. Anarchist, socialist, even communist ideas are hard coded in Cypherpunk. We need look no further than the woman who coined the term itself: Jude Milhon, active in civil rights, feminism, radical health care, supportive of New Left ideals, and lived communally. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jude_Milhon Great read. Just advocating for a more inclusive narrative that reflects who really helped shape the ethos and adds nuance to the distortion that this shit was birthed by a bunch of libertarian bros.
4 replies
1 recast
14 reactions
ash pfp
ash
@ashmoney.eth
could not agree more. voting for a candidate because they are pro-crypto is a big mistake.
1 reply
0 recast
12 reactions
deep substrate foliated tomato pfp
deep substrate foliated tomato
@tomato.eth
All the bitcoin maximalists are going to love this. ๐Ÿ˜†
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Sterling Schuyler pfp
Sterling Schuyler
@sterschuyler
"The crypto industry is uniquely international, and so immigration law is crypto law. Which politicians, and which countries, recognize this?" YES. The first time crypto really "clicked" with me was when I realized how important it is/will be for immigrants and asylum seekers. "Crypto friendly" is more than ๐Ÿ’ต
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
kepano pfp
kepano
@kepano
if the goal is to create technology that is resilient to government intervention, then the legal status of this technology should be irrelevant โ€” a regime that is against such technology paradoxically creates better incentives for its development, whereas the opposite allows external dependencies to creep in
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Hunter Horsley pfp
Hunter Horsley
@hunter
Love this. Well said. And worth saying.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Mats pfp
Mats
@mats
There's an election and you equally dislike both candidates. One says they support crypto. Which one do you pick?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Catch0x22 pfp
Catch0x22
@catch0x22.eth
Yeah there's no way it's a good idea. Politicians knowledgeable is what we need but they need to be bipartisan
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Joe Blau ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Joe Blau ๐ŸŽฉ
@joeblau
It's lesser-evilism disguised as pro-crypto.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson pfp
Dwayne 'The Jock' Ronson
@dwayne
This is a good principle generally. Though you could argue that, unlike other issues which are more perennial, this is a make or break moment for crypto. Other issues may always be relitigated in future elections, in either direction, but crypto-as-cryptocurrency cannot. Because it's financial infrastructure and once these things are embedded there's no going back. Another thing you say is that support for crypto now doesn't mean support later. This applies to every issue though. It's an age-old politician thing. Not specific to crypto. But like I said above, crypto-as-cryptocurrency is much more difficult to roll back once it's embedded. So support in the early innings is disproportionately valuable. *hits cast and waits to be demolished by V*
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Greg Lang pfp
Greg Lang
@designheretic
Do you see an appreciable difference between choosing political allegiances based on who espouses pro-crypto rhetoric and boycotting political support based on who supports anti-crypto policies?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
It's unclear that any political party out there would support true anonymous online payments, sadly. The political pandering seems to be mostly aimed at the casino parts.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
britt pfp
britt
@brittkim.eth
Reasonable.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
๐’‚ญ_๐’‚ญ pfp
๐’‚ญ_๐’‚ญ
@m-j-r
@mazmhussain there's a toll goods solution for journalists.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ pfp
Jacek.degen.eth ๐ŸŽฉ
@jacek
103 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Ben pfp
Ben
@benersing
I agree conceptually with the ideals you've laid out, but it reads like an โ€œall or nothingโ€ call on Washington, which history would suggest would lead to slower adoption and more attack. Advancing a goal via modern politics requires compromise, choosing oneโ€™s battles and securing wins with new allies when possible. How would you propose people work within the existing system to take steps towards the ideal state, without making any concessions?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction