@vietanh3010
Spent the last few days tracing the rhythm behind @iccm.eth and how it redefines creator participation on @base
The structure
๐ Every creator gets a personal coin that fuels their Flaunch Group
๐ Stake โ earn ETH โ fund new projects โ rewards flow back
๐ Itโs not passive yield โ itโs cultural liquidity that compounds through participation
The loop
๐ Mint on @zora for access and discovery
๐ Farm on @flaunchgg to drive creator yield
๐ Govern via DAO emissions as the cycle expands
๐ Everything syncs seamlessly โ no friction, no middle layer
Why it matters
๐ ICCM isnโt just another creator platform โ itโs programmable culture
๐ Ownership, distribution, and capital all move in one coordinated loop
๐ It breathes with the creators inside it instead of being a static token model
If youโre tracking frameworks where influence becomes capital, this is the one to study
Will you test the loop before the DAO layer unlocks?