@trigs.eth
Sounds interesting. Help me out if I'm getting it:
- It's a public ranking site where ppl can rank projects/initiatives based on their perception of its impact.
- Participants can earn reputation/rewards for engaging with projects, whether it be on the ground (assuming) or just through the site by providing impact analysis.
If I'm not totally wrong, I have questions:
1. What's the proof of personhood to prevent ranking manipulation?
2. Is there anything to quantify people's expertise to provide an analysis, or is it based purely on just ranking public perception? Meaning, will there be objective third party expert analysis to help educate ppl, or will ppl just be going off of their limited experience and whatever quantitative analysis the project themselves provide?
I have a lot more questions based on some of the answers/clarifications... Seems like an interesting idea but I'm really curious about implementation because this is an extremely challenging problem space to tackle!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction