Trexer.nad (trexer)

Sometimes, I think prediction markets don’t know what they are To bettors, they’re casinos with better UX. Thrill, odds, payout, but nothing deeper To forecasters, they’re supposed to be truth engines. Calibration, signal, epistemics Tbh, the problem is….both groups are trapped in the same pool So we end up with a weird hybrid: a lab experiment that smells like a sportsbook Everyone swears it’s the future, but half the players are just here for the dopamine Maybe that’s why the signal never feels clean

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

Ethereum Breaks Out: Context, Causes, and Consequences

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 2 reactions

You know a system works when you don’t even notice it working. That’s McDonald’s. And somehow, that’s also Monad. I unpacked this weird but fitting analogy in my latest piece:

• 1 reply
• 0 recasts
• 4 reactions

A healthy degen

• 4 replies
• 3 recasts
• 14 reactions

Monad launched its testnet in February. Since then, it’s quietly evolved into something that doesn’t feel like a testnet at all. Here’s the full write-up of what it’s like to use it today:

• 1 reply
• 3 recasts
• 10 reactions

To understand Monad’s unique edge, we need to take a step back and imagine the Ethereum Virtual Machine in a completely different light. In this post, I break down why Monad’s approach to execution opens up entirely new doors, unlike anything we’ve seen in Ethereum’s architecture. Ready for a wild ride into the future of blockchain? Check it out:

• 1 reply
• 1 recast
• 9 reactions

Everyone talks about Monad’s speed. But no one asks how it stays correct while going that fast. The answer? Deterministic re-execution. (And no, it’s not as scary as it sounds.) Full breakdown:

• 0 replies
• 1 recast
• 8 reactions