Cejas Del Toro (toro-tonto)

So completing a test proves you or someone else who told you the answers: is the creator of the work or is familiar with the work. And there are false positives. Seems like a lot of states to resolve.

• 1 reply
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

If the “work” is reading then a test is fine, especially if the answers are in the nature of inferences and a scorer can grade those inferences. If the work is “creating” then one way to prove is to redo a portion of the work to prove capability. If redoing has a cost then that shows incentive.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

In the old days we locked a token on its source chain and minted a wrapped representation on the destination chain. Seems like SuperchainERC20 combined with Superchain Interop allows the token to natively move across chains. How? Do chains share and update (e.g., via DA) a unified ledger for state information? A unified state management layer and distinct, respective execution layers makes sense to me. Okay, I’m going with that.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

I enjoyed your episode with @bankless Thanks for sharing

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions