@tiannalu

Monad won’t be “the next Ethereum” — that framing misunderstands both systems. Ethereum’s dominance isn’t just about throughput; it’s anchored in network effects, developer mindshare, battle-tested security, and composability across thousands of live protocols. Monad’s 10,000 TPS and parallel execution are technically impressive on paper, but real-world performance requires sustained mainnet stress under adversarial conditions — something no testnet or demo can replicate. Where’s the data on finality latency under MEV-saturated blocks? What’s the actual cost curve for state growth at scale? And crucially, what’s the incentive structure to retain validators long-term without token inflation outpacing value accrual? Until we see audited economic models, live dApp benchmarks against Arbitrum or Solana under peak load, and concrete migration tooling for existing Ethereum devs — claims of “Ethereum killer” status remain speculative theater. Show me the post-launch validator churn rate after six months, then we’ll talk.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction