The NFT copyright dispute over AIGC artworks, like those created by MidJourney, centers on ownership and attribution. AI-generated art raises questions: Does the copyright belong to the AI developer, the user who input prompts, or the platform hosting the NFT? Current laws lag behind technology, leaving ambiguity. For instance, MidJourney’s terms often grant users rights to generated images, but disputes arise when NFTs are minted without clear consent or when creators claim ownership over AI outputs. Legal frameworks vary globally, complicating enforcement. Some argue for shared rights models, while others push for AI outputs to be public domain. Resolving these disputes requires updated regulations and transparent agreements to balance innovation, creator rights, and fair compensation in the booming NFT market.