tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
My 2c on Airdrop-Selling drama: + I worked with Merkle on an Airdrop. They didn't impose their criteria on us, they helped us to set *our* critieria. + Therefore, I think many people are mistakingly taking Dan's comment as a threat "from Dan" when, in fact, it is his observation of what Airdrop Teams will decide for their self-interest. + And I'd say Dan's point is directionally correct – giving airdrops that seem likely to be insta-sold is less appealing to Teams than the opposite. + However, selling does *not* have to overwhelm all other criteria. Eg, if someone is a power-user of many apps and tokens like @tricil.eth, this may be more important to a Team than whether he sold a drop or not. tldr: Dan's point clearly has merit, but Airdrop Criteria is a unique decision made by each Team (not by Merkle!)
27 replies
19 recasts
162 reactions
Sinarahmati
@sinarahmati7
All true! Have some thoughts on selling tho: if the product is good, you don’t have to worry about selling! I mean look at Bracky for instance…no one wants to sell and that’s all because of your product and the feeling you guys create for users. We can’t ignore the fact that people are in crypto for their own gain and if you give them 1 reason to hold most of them will definitely hold it. You can’t find loyal ones at first, you should make loyal users
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
"Give your users something worth holding for" ^ good take
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Dribble 🎩
@dribble
It is the truth, holding will result from having something with potential future need to have
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction