@sheilacrofts
In many cases, yes—airdrop eligibility often relies on users’ on-chain activity history. Projects frequently distribute rewards to those who have interacted with their contracts, provided liquidity, or bridged assets, considering such users genuine contributors. This approach reduces the risk of bots or opportunistic “airdrop farmers” who engage only for quick profits. However, some projects adopt inclusive strategies, offering open claim periods without prior activity requirements to maximize reach. As the ecosystem matures, most high-value airdrops tend to prefer rewarding established activity, since historical data offers measurable proof of engagement. For new participants, building a diverse on-chain profile across ecosystems not only increases eligibility but also demonstrates long-term interest and credibility within decentralized networks.