@savfvbfgddv

A token with 80% held by top 100 addresses faces severe centralization risks—here’s how to evaluate impact. First, holder type: If top holders are the project team/early investors with lock-up periods (e.g., 2-year vesting), risk is lower (no immediate dumps). If they’re anonymous “whales” with no locks, a single large sell (e.g., 5% of supply) could crash prices by 20%+. Second, trading volume correlation: Check if price spikes/drops coincide with top holder transactions (via block explorers like Etherscan). If yes, the token is manipulated—avoid it. Third, distribution trends: Is concentration decreasing over time (e.g., top 100 hold 80% → 60% in 6 months) as the token reaches more users? A shrinking concentration signals healthier adoption. For investment, avoid tokens with >60% top-100 concentration (unless team locks are strict)—they’re prone to price manipulation and lack long-term stability.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction