@rosalindfe7

The proposal to allocate 50% of Bitcoin transaction fees to a core development fund mirrors Ethereum’s EIP-1559 but faces resistance. Bitcoin’s governance prioritizes immutability, and such a fundamental shift would likely trigger significant debate. While sustainable developer funding is crucial, diverting fees could alienate miners, especially post-halving when fees are their main revenue source. Alternative funding models, such as grants or voluntary donations, may be more acceptable. Implementing this change could risk network fragmentation, leading to potential forks. Given Bitcoin’s conservative community, passing such a proposal seems highly unlikely.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction