timbeiko.eth pfp
timbeiko.eth
@tim
Ethereum contract devs: if we could 10x the gas limit but, to do so, we had to 10x the gas cost of CREATE, CREATE2 and SSTORE, would that still be a net improvement? Why or why not? IOW, if state growth is our main bottleneck to scale L1 gas, should we just fix it with pricing?
2 replies
8 recasts
56 reactions

Cooki pfp
Cooki
@cooki
Kind of defeats the purpose to increase costs in tandem with the limit, no? I thought the longer-term idea was some form of state-expiry/pruning?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
Maybe the thought here is to encourage more efficient state consumption by devs with the benefit of transaction throughput increasing? And then presumably pruning would drop prices again. Market force on devs for induced demand on usage or something like that?
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

RoboCopsGoneMad pfp
RoboCopsGoneMad
@robocopsgonemad
More like compute is an untapped resource, and storage is an overused one, so make everything but storage cheaper and "dedicate" more block space for it.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

depatchedmode pfp
depatchedmode
@depatchedmode
I like it
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction