@r863258sfg
Are there governance‑insurance options for slash-triggering votes?
The concept of "governance insurance" is nascent but emerging. It could work in two ways:
Coverage for Token Holders: A policy that pays out if a malicious governance vote passes and causes financial loss (including slashing losses).
Coverage for Operators: A policy that specifically pays operators if they are slashed as a direct result of a governance-mandated change.
Pricing this insurance would be incredibly complex, as it requires modeling the probability of a successful governance attack. However, the existence of such a market would be a strong leading indicator of the perceived risk and could help quantify the cost of poor governance structures.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction