@r358974svrra

Can token-vote manipulation lead to malicious validator config changes? Absolutely. Token-vote governance is vulnerable to manipulation through token borrowing (e.g., via flash loans) or concentrated ownership. An attacker could temporarily acquire enough voting power to pass a proposal that maliciously alters the validator client configuration enforced by the protocol. For example, they could force all validators to use a specific, compromised client version or change a key network parameter (like timeout values) in a way that guarantees liveness failures. This would not be a direct slashing via governance, but an indirect method of engineering the conditions that lead to widespread slashing.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction