
polynya
@polynya
127 Following
252619 Followers

For my personal use, crypto is in a great place. Fees, speeds, wallet UX, applications are perfectly fine for my usecases, and they'll keep getting better. However, I'd like to see some things significantly improved, in order of importance:
- CRITICAL: Configurable withdrawal rate limiting in Safe & smart wallets and indeed, in all smart contracts, should be a standard. Without this, I significantly limit my usage of crypto
- Custodial standards for smart wallets
- Stage 2+ decentralisation for L2s, complete overhaul for Tron (normies receive USDT on Tron)
- EUR stables w/ liquidity
- Better frontends & standards
- More competition & options for minimal hardware wallets
- Range order management for Uniswap V4
- Significantly less volatile, reliable, long-term sustainable and high liquidity SoVs (BTC and ETH are far too erratic)
- Integration into widely adopted payment networks, both global and domestic
- Some inaccessible assets tokenised as RWAs
- Farcaster with bustling non-crypto content/discussions 66 replies
354 recasts
1751 reactions
60 replies
198 recasts
948 reactions
5 replies
18 recasts
111 reactions
22 replies
148 recasts
616 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
23 recasts
149 reactions
14 replies
34 recasts
173 reactions
4 replies
15 recasts
135 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Greed is the human instinct we have failed to keep in check.
It's not inevitable at all, most emerging industries have consortiums and strong intra-industry cooperation. In crypto, there's too much infighting with the focus on attracting greater fools, than improving our mechanism design and culture to be less negative-sum.
Worse still, most people actively encourage it, while the minority who see it as a problem just give up "it's just human nature, we can't do anything about it, I'll just focus on my lane". Categorically false. Literally, capitalism, which makes the modern world go round, is an exercise in harnessing greed to be positive-sum through good design & regulations.
Crypto is a rare and specific failure case, and it'll continue to be till the industry self-reflects and forms a will to improve.
There's also a lack of good regulations by most governments, but I'd argue this is largely downstream of the above. 1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
10 replies
49 recasts
225 reactions
4 replies
8 recasts
68 reactions
16 replies
20 recasts
143 reactions
I haven't commented about rollups in several months, if not over a year, so I'm just a casual observer now...
Native rollups are pretty cool, and what I meant by "enshrined zkEVM bridge" a couple of years ago (except they've got a wider scope than zkEVMs)
However, they are not "enshrined rollups", as I wrote about them at least, which are in-protocol, L1 rollups
Overarching thought on rollups: there simply has not been anywhere enough demand to saturate 1,000+ chains by 2025 like I had expected in 2021. Including all L1s and L2s, there's maybe like 10, at most. I'm sure demand will grow, but not to the magnitude anyone expected. It would be prudent to factor in this lower terminal demand in infrastructure designs, instead of just "build it they'll come" hopium.
https://x.com/apolynya/status/1629651981768990720 3 replies
13 recasts
99 reactions
30 replies
67 recasts
411 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
8 replies
23 recasts
126 reactions
19 replies
47 recasts
208 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction