plaintext.eth (plaintext.eth)

The Warpcast team updated their dataset of user spam labels a few hours ago. They have been doing this weekly for about a month and I have been going through the data on each release. This update was probably the biggest change in the data in terms of the distribution of spam labels: After the previous release only ~9% of users with labels were labeled as unlikely to be spam and 42% as might engage in spam. The remaining 49% were labeled as likely to engage in spam (these are the three labels that exist - a user can also have no label). After this release 18% of users are labeled as unlikely - doubled from before this update - and only 35% as might be spam. So there has been a big increase in users labeled as unlikely to be spam, which is coming from a relabeling of existing users. About 19k users who were previously labeled as likely to be spam and ~29k users who were labeled as might be spam are now labeled as unlikely. ->

• 1 reply
• 2 recasts
• 5 reactions

There has been a lot of spam on XMTP these past few days, so wouldn’t it be cool to have: staked and non-staked addresses, where users can choose in the app layer to only receive messages from staked addresses. If the adress receives enough complaints (governed by smart contract) the address is slashed. ?

• 8 replies
• 1 recast
• 5 reactions

If you’re wearing an ar device and look at a qr code, info will probably just immediately pop up in your field of view. Makes qr codes much more accessible and useful for any kind of real-world information, like train schedules etc. I wonder how the physical world will change as a result of people wearing ar.

• 2 replies
• 0 recasts
• 5 reactions

Congratulations to all of you who are getting new iPhones!

• 2 replies
• 0 recasts
• 5 reactions