Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/fc-devs
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Patrick | Megapot pfp
Patrick | Megapot
@pl
if farcaster team wants to add a token to the protocol, what would that process look like? for the sake of debate, let's say it's an egregious fee. can they push through a FIP even if others building on the protocol (eg. base) don't support it?
3 replies
1 recast
13 reactions

Patrick | Megapot pfp
Patrick | Megapot
@pl
this is all theoretical ofc. i don't know enough about FIPs and how similar or different they are to EIPs, or how voting (if any) works, hoping someone is kind enough to ELI5 for me
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Samuel ツ pfp
Samuel ツ
@samuellhuber.eth
They can
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

polymutex pfp
polymutex
@polymutex.eth
Yes and no. Like blockchains, the network would fork, and participants that support the change would follow the version with the change, while the rest would follow the version without the change. Most likely, posts from that point onwards would only show up on Farcaster clients that read from that version. What that would prevent this from being introduced or implemented in practice is social consensus. A social network is only as strong and as valuable as its userbase. Per naive application of Metcalfe's Law, you can intuit that introducing a change that is popular with only, say, 25% of the network would make that part of the network ~94% less valuable. It would be social network suicide.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction