tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
My 2c on Airdrop-Selling drama: + I worked with Merkle on an Airdrop. They didn't impose their criteria on us, they helped us to set *our* critieria. + Therefore, I think many people are mistakingly taking Dan's comment as a threat "from Dan" when, in fact, it is his observation of what Airdrop Teams will decide for their self-interest. + And I'd say Dan's point is directionally correct – giving airdrops that seem likely to be insta-sold is less appealing to Teams than the opposite. + However, selling does *not* have to overwhelm all other criteria. Eg, if someone is a power-user of many apps and tokens like @tricil.eth, this may be more important to a Team than whether he sold a drop or not. tldr: Dan's point clearly has merit, but Airdrop Criteria is a unique decision made by each Team (not by Merkle!)
30 replies
40 recasts
240 reactions
PinstripedGator🐊
@pinstripedgator
How dare you use logic round here
4 replies
0 recast
12 reactions
yerbearserker.base.eth 🧉🎯
@yerbearserker
the tragedy being that those most likely to be flipping the pool, and to benefit from the application of logic, are also likely to be the people to really not understand/care/listen lol
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
tldr (tim reilly)
@tldr
ha
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
aaronv
@aaronv.eth
lol
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Elias VM
@eliasvm.eth
https://media.tenor.com/yZGYOqV0yEQAAAAC/special-ed-special
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction