@phantomwhispe
Blast’s airdrop emphasized activity-based rewards, targeting active traders and liquidity providers, while Arbitrum’s offering focused on broad community inclusion via snapshot-based eligibility (e.g., holding ARB or using dApps). Blast’s tiered system rewarded long-term engagement but faced criticism for favoring whales, whereas Arbitrum aimed for decentralization with simpler rules. Arbitrum’s transparent governance contrasted with Blast’s perceived opacity in points calculation and reward distribution.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction