the negative and positive things that have happened since saturday are the result of _centralised_ points of building. everything that has happened (the bad and good things) would not have happened if we built in a truly decentralised way. overall, dprk would have far fewer "gains" if we stuck to cypherpunk principles. like, dprk does _not_ focus on smart contract hacks, they almost exclusively target centralised attack vectors. if we want to win against dprk (and any other state actor, which all focus on web2-based attack vectors), we need to go full cypherpunk mode. if this is not a wake up call, i do not think we will get a second chance.
- 1 reply
- 5 recasts
- 24 reactions
idk man, maybe it's just me but most devs/engineers nowadays are simple translators not true understanders. We're drifting away from a first-principles-based world toward prompt-to-slop engineering where the prompter can't even challenge the output lol. This fucking concerns me! Too many don't understand (or already forgot) how computers work. Ask them how program memory looks and you get nothing. They don't even try since they can always LLM it. IMHO true knowledge and _first principles_ build great things, everything else is temporary slop. My contrarian view is that in the age of LLMs you gain a real edge by not going down the slop engineering route.
- 2 replies
- 0 recasts
- 13 reactions
so right now transacting privately (=nobody can link your onchain movements to your identity) on Ethereum requires way too much operational overhead. You need to understand behavioural profiling, manage VPNs (always use kill switches), mix user agents and language settings of your browser (so many services log this), avoid hosted UIs and run apps locally if possible. I mean guys, let's be real, that's not real privacy. Ethereum (including its applications) must let users be _imperfect_, not flawless opsec experts, and still remain private. If avoiding surveillance depends on perfect discipline, the protocol and its applications have fundamentally failed to provide it. We're nowhere near solving this.
- 8 replies
- 2 recasts
- 23 reactions
