onchainorgs (oco)

1/ CZ and Binance biting the dust and @barmstrong 's take highlights a tension between internationalism and globalism that exists in crypto. https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/1727054176763756826

• 1 reply
• 1 recast
• 1 reaction

The Sam Altman departure from OpenAI begs the question—how can an organization, over time, iterate to align incentives when its governance is designed to be easily captured? Can an organization be "provably" anticapture? @spengrah.eth

• 1 reply
• 0 recasts
• 2 reactions

How would you describe the relationship between organizations and governance? Once we reach endgame for DAOs, do organizations end up being their governance? If yes, what are some factors that are not being discussed on our way there? If no, what factors will we have remaining once we're at endgame? What is endgame?

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction

Gen1 DAOs, so far, have been a conflation of 4 types of orgs: open source, remote, flat, and onchain. Other than onchain orgs the others each have their own history with best practices. We aren't surrounded by unknown unknown "problems with DAOs" yet. Typically, the causes are hard-to-identify known unknowns.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction