onchainorgs (oco)

(Thoughts while reading Brave New World Revisited) Do DAOs over or under organize compared to existing organizations or existing means of organizing?

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

You need DAOs when: 1. Admin procedures ie registering businesses is cumbersome. 2. What's on your operating agreement is illegal, alegal, or not guaranteed by your jurisdiction and its law. 3. You distrust your guarantor ie govrnment. 4. You need immediate execution of decisions that's free from human error.

• 2 replies
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction

Far East Asia governments such as Japan and Taiwan are embracing and leveraging DAOs for public and common goods. Are there any examples like these outside Far East Asia or are all examples centered around individuals and groups of individuals so far? https://nishikigoinft.com/crypto-village

• 1 reply
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction

1/ CZ and Binance biting the dust and @barmstrong 's take highlights a tension between internationalism and globalism that exists in crypto. https://twitter.com/brian_armstrong/status/1727054176763756826

• 1 reply
• 1 recast
• 1 reaction

The Sam Altman departure from OpenAI begs the question—how can an organization, over time, iterate to align incentives when its governance is designed to be easily captured? Can an organization be "provably" anticapture? @spengrah.eth

• 1 reply
• 0 recasts
• 2 reactions

How would you describe the relationship between organizations and governance? Once we reach endgame for DAOs, do organizations end up being their governance? If yes, what are some factors that are not being discussed on our way there? If no, what factors will we have remaining once we're at endgame? What is endgame?

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction

Gen1 DAOs, so far, have been a conflation of 4 types of orgs: open source, remote, flat, and onchain. Other than onchain orgs the others each have their own history with best practices. We aren't surrounded by unknown unknown "problems with DAOs" yet. Typically, the causes are hard-to-identify known unknowns.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction