2 Followers
I agree. The defeat of Proposal 536 stemmed from a misunderstanding. It was perceived as a strategic vote, imagined as a conflict between the tokenized NounsDAO and the NFT community's NounsDAO strategies. Opponents rejected this route due to concerns about regulatory issues and an incomplete token model.
However, this vote wasn't about strategy. It was simply a request for Nouns product audit fees. A small feature, where the token is the product, could be more competitive on Farcaster. Some community members need this use case, similar to $degen use cases on Farcaster.