Hi , If the original token is restricted while look-alike tokens trade freely, what happens to neutrality? Is decentralization only at the protocol level, or should interfaces reflect it too? The ecosystem is [email protected]
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
Woof
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
To the Uniswap Team, We request immediate clarification regarding an inconsistency affecting the Cocoro BlackShib community. The original Cocoro BlackShib token: 0xa93d86Af16fe83F064E3C0e2F3d129F7B7b002b0 appears to be blocked from trading on the Uniswap interface. Meanwhile, other tokens using the “Cocoro” name, such as: 0xF834F9B2bB88357bba3A3BF840dE80B4c1f5b570 remain fully tradable. We ask: • Why is the original token restricted? • What criteria triggered this action? • Why are similarly named tokens allowed to trade? • What steps are required to restore access? Transparency and neutrality are essential to DeFi. Cocoro BlackShib Community @uniswap @vitalik.eth @forbes @haydenzadams @coinbase
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions