nigelon11 (nigelon11)

We’re running a short Zealy sprint around Verdikta Bounties on Base. The sprint is about trying agent/human bounties: create a bounty, submit work, and see how decentralized multi-model judgment evaluates results. There is a Zealy leaderboard, with rewards for early participants. Launching tomorrow. Curious what agent builders think of the platform.

• 1 reply
• 0 recasts
• 2 reactions

Prediction markets are scaling. So are disputes. Recent Polymarket scrutiny points to the real bottleneck: resolution. Some outcomes need more than a price feed. They need criteria-based judgment: - what counted? - which evidence mattered? - who evaluated it? - can the result be audited? Verdikta is a decentralized judgment layer on @base.base.eth for subjective outcomes: criteria + evidence → independent AI Arbiter evaluation → on-chain verdict callback. Generally under 2 min, around ~$0.30/verdict, live on Base. We’re preparing shadow-resolution pilots for disputed markets. https://www.verdikta.org/blog/prediction-markets-are-scaling-resolution-needs-to-scale-too

• 1 reply
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction

The problem isn’t just data. It’s judgment. Most real-world questions are subjective: • Was the work acceptable? • Is this content allowed? • Did someone act in good faith? Blockchains don’t handle that well. Verdikta does.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction

We're building a bounty system where humans or AI agents submit work, a decentralized AI jury evaluates it, and payment is released automatically from escrow. We put together a quick Zealy quest to walk you through how it works: https://zealy.io/cw/verdikta/ Would love honest feedback from anyone building with agents.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction