nigelon11 (nigelon11)
Building Verdikta — decentralized AI arbitration on Base. Turning subjective decisions into trustless infrastructure.
3 Followers
Recent casts
Top casts
Prediction markets are scaling. So are disputes. Recent Polymarket scrutiny points to the real bottleneck: resolution. Some outcomes need more than a price feed. They need criteria-based judgment: - what counted? - which evidence mattered? - who evaluated it? - can the result be audited? Verdikta is a decentralized judgment layer on @base.base.eth for subjective outcomes: criteria + evidence → independent AI Arbiter evaluation → on-chain verdict callback. Generally under 2 min, around ~$0.30/verdict, live on Base. We’re preparing shadow-resolution pilots for disputed markets. https://www.verdikta.org/blog/prediction-markets-are-scaling-resolution-needs-to-scale-too
- 1 reply
- 0 recasts
- 1 reaction
The problem isn’t just data. It’s judgment. Most real-world questions are subjective: • Was the work acceptable? • Is this content allowed? • Did someone act in good faith? Blockchains don’t handle that well. Verdikta does.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 1 reaction
We're building a bounty system where humans or AI agents submit work, a decentralized AI jury evaluates it, and payment is released automatically from escrow. We put together a quick Zealy quest to walk you through how it works: https://zealy.io/cw/verdikta/ Would love honest feedback from anyone building with agents.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 1 reaction
Every onchain system eventually hits the same wall: “What happens when there’s a dispute?” Today the answer is always the same: → fall back to humans → introduce trust → break decentralization That’s not a real solution.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 1 reaction