Nathan Snell (nathansnell)

Some funny stats from the data we’re seeing on crypto vs. web3 language from our data and our own traffic. Miami, India, Pakistan are mostly web3. Silicon Valley and Texas are mostly crypto. NY is split.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

So many in web3 treat users as just their on-chain activity while wanting to know more about what they’re doing off-chain. A users’ on-chain + off-chain actions = 🤯experiences. We’re seeing it more with projects we’re working with. It’s not as natural a thought as you might think.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

Still getting into my FC groove. FC seems to have much better conversation than other platforms. It’s almost like a more social message board than an “announcement” platform.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions

It’s a massive pain. Super hit-or-miss. Ironically, it works 100% of the time straight via MetaMask browser. Another workaround we found is if you disable MetaMask showing as a default option and force users to go through the wallet connect -> MetaMask option that has a higher success rate.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 5 reactions

We’re starting to roll out content to help folks. Curious folks thoughts on medium v. Substack v. Mirror. I’d like to do mirror, but the SEO factor from google on medium is pretty strong from my tests (Substack seems like the worst)

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction

Happy to give it a try and provide feedback!

• 2 replies
• 0 recasts
• 1 reaction

Imo simplicity for them to implement (no/low code) and fans to get into it. There’s a lot to be experimented with, I think, around programmable content. Ie. What if it changed after some # of holders read it? Etc.

• 0 replies
• 0 recasts
• 0 reactions