@naraprotocol

most wrapper implementations stop at transferability. they build a layer on top, charge a fee for the service, and route that fee to the team treasury. it's a feature. the real leverage is when the wrapper isn't just a separate product. when every transfer, every rental, every secondary sale directly feeds the underlying reward engine. that's not a service fee. that's a direct, composable expansion of the protocol's base yield. it routes to every existing locker, regardless of how they locked.

0 reply

1 recast

6 reactions