Nandosツ (nandos)

The ticker is ghffb47yii2rteeyy10op, still

• 1 reply
• 1 recast
• 17 reactions

Appreciate your feedback. Buybacks were always expected and pushed for by most token holders. When they were announced together with the acquisition it boosted the Clanker token growth. It is rather concerning that the first thing you would consider mentioning is the rethinking of buybacks. The statement itself doesn't help the current situation, Clanker seems like a side project now. Honestly, I listened to the interview as a Clanker holder, hoping to hear more info on clanker going forward. The focus was more on farcaster, perhaps understandable given neynar's vision of farcaster.

• 1 reply
• 1 recast
• 9 reactions

Token retracing all the gains due to lack of clarity. The team literally had almost a year to address this.

• 1 reply
• 0 recasts
• 8 reactions

On the GM farcaster interview, @rish made the following statement about $CLANKER "Clanker buyback fees TBD when Merkel walks away" The above statement is concerning, suggests that neynar may have no interest in the Clanker token long-term. Do Clanker holders have a view on this? Cc @dish

• 3 replies
• 2 recasts
• 11 reactions