@n0excuses
Zama is multi-chain.
It’s not locked to one ecosystem, but built to work across L1s and L2s.
That means more flexibility for developers and users.
➣ Why does this matter?
Most projects stick to one chain, which limits adoption and reach.
Being multi-chain = real interoperability and better user experience
➣ @zama adds something more: privacy as a plug-in.
Think of it as a module you can integrate into any chain, instead of reinventing the wheel.
➣ With FHE, you can compute on encrypted data.
Balances, transfers, and even smart contracts stay private without breaking usability.
➣ The result: developers build once, users enjoy privacy everywhere, and chains stay open.
That’s the real value of Zama’s multi-chain approach.
#ZamaCreatorProgram
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction