ml-sudo pfp

ml-sudo

@ml-sudo

86 Following
139 Followers
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
Is there a way to prove that you don't store phone numbers after verification? Trusted execution environments, perhaps...?
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
How about making the $25 a persistent requirement? That would be a stronger determinant against bot farms who can easily generate X accounts and phone numbers. 1MDB managed to convince bankers that they had $1.5bn, by showing that they had $250mn transferred in, 6 times. But all they did was sweep the $250mn out every time in flowed in (yes, some people responsible for huge amounts of money don't use enough of their brain. like whomever designed the Coinbase customer support system where any agent can see sensitive data belonging to all their customers. Okay.)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
for the people building privacy blockchains, this is an application i find interesting, and so might ur BD teams chasing applications: an on-chain Carta (equity ownership record). from my own experience in different roles (equity issuing and equity purchasing), the problem they are trying to solve is real. I'm not sure if they will manage to change behavior, or if it is a problem that is high priority for any of the intended users, but i believe they are solving a problem that does exist
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
Joris 🧢 pfp
Joris 🧢
@joris
Today we released the Open Cap Table Protocol (OCP) whitepaper: the onchain infrastructure making equity programmable. If you believe ownership should move like code, this is the spec 🧵
17 replies
63 recasts
307 reactions
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
2025 is shaping up to be the year of privacy in crypto 2023-2024 was an extinction event, with many privacy projects burying themselves or going into hiding... AND NOW WE ARE FINALLY BACK! ty universe
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
@coinbase it would be more fun if you offered a $21mn bounty for a $20mn ransom. Bigger middle finger to the hackers!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
​woj pfp
​woj
@woj.eth
apple just sent this email to all ios app developers generational golden consumer crypto bull run
26 replies
49 recasts
334 reactions
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
Who else faces this problem in ChatGPT? problem: i research a topic new to me. ChatGPT gives me a nice overview. as i go through each section of the answer, I have more questions (need to drill down). but i don't want to mess with the flow. So i have to open another chat window to ask specific questions. But this loses context and forces me to switch windows which affects my learning/retention. what do u think of this feature suggestion: allow users to open new chats by right clicking, and display answers to the sub-questions in bubbles. In this way, users don't lose their thought process as they make their way through the overview.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
Woah!!! Ever felt grossed out handing over your ID card to some stranger because they had to verify your age or some other detail? Now a solution, out in the wild, 30 years after zero knowledge proofs were theorized! https://blog.google/products/google-pay/google-wallet-age-identity-verifications/
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
(Clarifying: the short post was on X)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
I’d like to use a social media platform that allows me to choose the algo with which they serve me posts I’d focus on posts that are * thought provoking + * balance emotional valence + * a preferred list of accounts + * a blacklist of accounts with low emotional maturity or too much anger Inspiration: my recent short post making fun of a scammer in salty way garnered 50x the engagement compared to posts with product ideas or reflections on the industry. Unless something changes, overtime we will make ourselves into vitriolic, overconfident assholes. @farcaster
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
We need to d/acc reality. Root deep in what’s true. Reject what’s false, even if it’s beautiful. What are we doing to prepare? (Image: lion with cat eyes. Lions have round pupils, whereas cats have slits.)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
Governance upgrade idea: an association for board education in crypto
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
https://warpcast.com/ml-sudo/0x2895bf43
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
Twitter algo seemed to turn on me in the last few weeks. Suspect it’s due to a history of posts poking fun at EEEE and TTTTT (others report same). I could trawl thru yearrrrrs of posts to delete them or… Keep my spine and come to @farcaster
1 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
On users: what does the user segmentation look like? What’s the plan for each segment look like? How does the EF allocate resources among user personas?
0 reply
0 recast
8 reactions
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
That will work - until you get big enough. More people you don’t know, more sophisticated scammers. Maybe you can wait until then to think about this.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
For example, someone creates @drw.eth (almost identical to dwr.eth), or @danromero, and posts or DMs ppl, intending to scam them of crypto. You find out, and you report to (er, yourself, haha), and ask the bad accounts to be taken down. But for Farcaster to believe you, they ask you to provide your ID docs (like X, Facebook, etc do). Impersonation is a common problem in social media. Has it not yet gotten to Farcaster? e.g. https://www.wired.com/story/classic-scam-steals-bitcoin-on-twitter/
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ml-sudo pfp
ml-sudo
@ml-sudo
Maybe more concretely: in order to determine that @dwr is who he represents to be, and @drw is impersonating dwr, you require dwr to submit ID docs (either to u or a service provider). But i don think you want to submit your ID image to some random social media platform or the third party they contracted, if you can avoid it.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction