My 2c on Airdrop-Selling drama:

+ I worked with Merkle on an Airdrop. They didn't impose their criteria on us, they helped us to set *our* critieria.

+ Therefore, I think many people are mistakingly taking Dan's comment as a threat "from Dan" when, in fact, it is his observation of what Airdrop Teams will decide for their self-interest.

+ And I'd say Dan's point is directionally correct – giving airdrops that seem likely to be insta-sold is less appealing to Teams than the opposite.

+ However, selling does *not* have to overwhelm all other criteria. Eg, if someone is a power-user of many apps and tokens like @tricil.eth, this may be more important to a Team than whether he sold a drop or not.

tldr: Dan's point clearly has merit, but Airdrop Criteria is a unique decision made by each Team (not by Merkle!)

Well said 

If your argument is “selling is good for your app actually” you need to convince the developers considering airdrops, not me.

GM 
the real challenge is shifting the mindset of the builders not the users.

I am a crypto trader and I want to help you in trading to grow you.

Use case is what I thing devs should buidl in. I mean, if the token's use case ain't on speculation, folks will keep buying for whomever is selling and dev won't nee any buy back. Imagine a buy back of BTC or Eth 😂, it doesn't exist. Why, because of use-case.

Absolutely.
The onus rests solely on the builders.