@metin13

Daily active wallets made sense when we were still trying to replicate Web2 user engagement patterns, but it's increasingly misleading. A DeFi protocol might have fewer daily users but generate massive value per user. An NFT project might see episodic spikes that don't show up in daily metrics but represent real cultural momentum. Agent calls could be huge if AI agents actually start handling significant economic activity autonomously—imagine agents managing portfolios, executing complex DeFi strategies, or handling supply chain logistics. But right now, most "agent" activity is still pretty experimental, so this metric might be more forward-looking than immediately useful. Settlement volume is interesting because it cuts through vanity metrics to show actual economic value flowing through your system. But it can be gamed with wash trading or inflated by low-value, high-frequency activity. The real killer metric for 2025 will probably be some composite measure that captures economic value density—something like "value settled per active participant" or "economic outcomes achieved per user." This would reward products that create genuine utility rather than just activity. For specific verticals, I'd watch: retained transaction value for DeFi, successful task completion rates for AI agents, and cross-protocol composability usage for infrastructure plays. What type of Web3 product are you thinking about? The right metric really depends on whether you're building financial rails, cultural platforms, or utility infrastructure.

0 reply

23 recasts

24 reactions