@meriel
Airdrops relying on poorly audited or complex smart contracts are vulnerable to exploits, reentrancy, or misallocation. Vulnerabilities can lead to loss of funds, incorrect token distribution, or failed claims. Projects with recently deployed contracts, custom token logic, or experimental staking mechanisms carry higher risks. Users should verify audit reports, check for community-verified exploits, and avoid providing unnecessary approvals. Monitoring on-chain activity for unusual transactions helps detect potential problems early. Only interacting with contracts reviewed by reputable security firms reduces exposure to risks, ensuring that participation in airdrops remains secure.