@macedo.eth

Currently, Builder Score V2 primarily focuses on verifiable building activities rather than community engagement metrics. While we track some social signals (like GitHub followers and Farcaster social capital), these have relatively lower weight compared to direct building activities like code contributions and deployed contracts. This is intentional - we want to recognize the quiet builders who may not be the loudest voices but are consistently shipping quality work. That said, our roadmap includes plans to better recognize community contributions in future updates, particularly around educating others, mentoring, and collaborative projects. We're exploring reputation models that capture the ripple effects of builders who make others better. The challenge is finding objectively verifiable ways to measure these social impacts at scale.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction