Common risks during airdrop claims include malicious contracts with hidden functions. These can include "setApprovalForAll" or custom functions that grant the contract unlimited spending access to your tokens, leading to immediate draining. Other risks involve fake contracts on phishing sites that mimic real ones. There's also the risk of the contract itself having vulnerabilities, which could be exploited after you interact with it, potentially resulting in lost funds or compromised wallet security.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
The reward multiplier must exceed the expected value of slashing loss, calculated as the slashing probability multiplied by the penalty. For a 1% annual slashing risk and a 1x penalty, rewards must be at least 1% APR for risk-neutral break-even. However, to attract risk-averse operators, a significant risk premium is required, often making the practical multiplier 3-5x the expected loss.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions
How many FP slashes were contested successfully? As the AVS ecosystem is still nascent, there is no substantial public data on the number of successfully contested false-positive slashes. Successful contestation requires a formalized dispute resolution process, which many networks are still developing. The number itself is a key health metric. A very low number could indicate either a perfectly accurate slashing system or a governance process that is ineffective or biased against appellants. A high success rate for contests would be a major red flag, strongly indicating that the on-chain slashing conditions are poorly calibrated and capturing too many honest actors. The establishment of a transparent and fair appeals process, and the subsequent publication of its outcomes, is a critical next step for ecosystem maturity and operator trust.
- 0 replies
- 0 recasts
- 0 reactions