@m-j-r.eth

in light of the hypersnap(chain) fork, there should be reevaluation of intrinsic value. simply put, the social input is mostly likes/recasts, the monetization is either gating or speculating, and the attractor is either status or stimulus. obviously, everyone is aware of the pairing of speculating and stimulus, though it is notable when that incentivizes mass replies, which are mostly redundant in value. similarly, gating and status are paired, but this incentivizes "iykyk" parent casts, often concentrating on trending topic. what's interesting, in the general memescape, is how publication complements consumption in gating and status. the speculating and stimulus is sort of skin-in-the-game sugarcoating beyond the substance. recalling https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=28681.msg360909#msg360909, there's mention of a threshold funding model for @vitalik.eth's two-part Bitcoin for Merchants. now, we have preview as content like PsyopAnime, or gonzo journalism like @nickshirley.base.eth, the sugarcoating is the blackbox redistribution of Twitter rather than the memecoins that punctuate every parent post. I think the missing opportunity is that likes/recasts are both a dynamic stake for rewarding distribution power, and the reactions don't possess enough dimensionality for qualifying distribution. now that each parent post can be polarizing and informative, especially now that each instance has a button to the platform chatbot which can return estimate of reaction, what's the most extensive stimulating distribution which naturally binds the latent reaction to uncertain, rewarding stasis?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction